Going above the norm for college
1. Who wrote the story?
Jake Brien was the staff writer.
2. What is their story about?
The story was about how hard it is to get accepted into a college and how expensive it can be.
3. What is their direct opinion about that topic? Please quote is directly from the story or do a really good job of paraphrasing.
In order for one to be accepted into a college, one must go above and beyond and do their best work, "It seems that getting into college is not only a hefty price to pay..."
4. Did they address what the other side might think about their topic.
He did not mention the other side of the topic.
5. Were they wishy-washy with their opinion? By this I mean did they every go back and say well maybe if this were to happen, then their opinion wouldn't be valid. Support your opinion.
His opinion was very clear, "...it's about self-perseverance and a determination to succeed beyond the norm."
6. Are there any quotes in the story?
No quotes were included.
7. What point of view did they write in (1st, 2nd, or 3rd)?
He wrote in 1st person point of view.
Immigration laws getting out of hand
1. Who wrote the story?
not stated
2. What is their story about?
immigration
3. What is their direct opinion about that topic? Please quote it directly from the story or do a really good job of paraphrasing.
The writer was for the actions of trump and against the new laws.
4. Did they address what the other side might think about their topic?
They addressed that people are wanted he immigration to either be legal or put and end to it.
5. Were they wishy-washy with their opinion? By this I mean did they every go back and say well maybe if this were to happen, then their opinion wouldn't be valid. Support your opinion.
The writer was very strict with there point and stated it though the whole story.
6. Are there any quotes in the story?
no quotes
7. What point of view did they write in (1st, 2nd or 3rd)?
first
Importance of physics class
1. Who wrote the story?
Abby Ong wrote the story.
2. What is their story about?
The story was about why one should take physics even though it is not required.
3. What is their direct opinion about that topic? Please quote is directly from the story or do a really good job of paraphrasing.
Their opinion was that one should take physics because it looks good when one applies for a college, "I believe all student should take it regardless of endorsement of future career choice."
Their opinion was that one should take physics because it looks good when one applies for a college, "I believe all student should take it regardless of endorsement of future career choice."
4. Did they address what the other side might think about their topic.
Yes, she did address the other side when she mentioned, "If there's another science class that interests yo a lot more, then I'd encourage you to take that class..."
Yes, she did address the other side when she mentioned, "If there's another science class that interests yo a lot more, then I'd encourage you to take that class..."
5. Were they wishy-washy with their opinion? By this I mean did they every go back and say well maybe if this were to happen, then their opinion wouldn't be valid. Support your opinion.
Her opinion was stated clearly. "Most colleges prefer applicants who have taken it..."
Her opinion was stated clearly. "Most colleges prefer applicants who have taken it..."
6. Are there any quotes in the story?
There are no quotes.
There are no quotes.
7. What point of view did they write in (1st, 2nd, or 3rd)?
This was told in 1st person point of view.
Our great Tree is Worth Saving
1. Who wrote the story?
Ian Miller
2. What is their story about?
The story is about saving the main big tree in the Bowie courtyard.
3. What is their direct opinion about that topic? Please quote it directly from the story or do a really good job of paraphrasing.
Ian's opinion is to save the tree and he thinks ore students should get involved to save the tree.
4. Did they address what the other side might think about their topic?
Ian did not mention the opposing side of cutting down the tree.
5. Were they wishy-washy with their opinion? By this I mean did they every go back and say well maybe if this were to happen, then their opinion wouldn't be valid. Support your opinion.
Ian is very straight forward about keeping the tree in the court yard.
6. Are there any quotes in the story?
No there are no quotes from the story.
7. What point of view did they write in (1st, 2nd or 3rd)?
First person
Betsy Devos unfit to serve as the U.S Secretary of education.
1. Who wrote the story?
Reagan Wallace
2. What is their story about?
The opinion reagan has toward the unqualification of betsy
3. What is their direct opinion about that topic? Please quote it directly from the story or do a really good job of paraphrasing.
Their direct opinion of the topic is that she does not have the experience to lead as the secretary of education, "...as an unfit education leader."
4. Did they address what the other side might think about their topic?
nothing out the opposing side.
5. Were they wishy-washy with their opinion? By this I mean did they every go back and say well maybe if this were to happen, then their opinion wouldn't be valid. Support your opinion.
she was very opinionated about her thought and stayed on topic
6. Are there any quotes in the story?
no quotes
7. What point of view did they write in (1st, 2nd or 3rd)?
first
A. What do you think the major differences between a hard news story and an opinions piece? Come up with at least three.
Hard: straight forward, based on facts, worded in a different point of view. Opinion: opinions, first person.
B. Why do you think there aren't very many photos on this page?
No photos were included on this page because there was not enough room. And they do a good job explaining
C. What are tree topics you think would be good to write an opinions piece on?Presidential controversy, school dress code, and Austin street traffic and roads, or any new laws.